References
*On average, the ECHELON™ 3000 Stapler with GST60G had less staple height variation vs. SureForm™ with 48360G on 3.0mm target tissue.
1. Ethicon. SureForm Transection Performance Benchmark Ver 9 software. 6/7/2024. Windchill #501978243
2. Ethicon. Evaluation of stomach tissue movement during stapler firing for claims: McLaren vs Signia. 3.9.2021. Windchill Document #500676460
3. Ethicon, Evaluation of Malformed Staples in Thick Tissue for Claims: ECHELON™ 3000 Stapler with GST vs EndoGIA and Signia with Tri-Staple Technology. 6.15.2024. Windchill Document #500697356
4. Ethicon, Ex-Vivo Comparison of Staple Line Leak Pressure: Echelon™ 3000 Stapler with GST vs EndoGIA and Signia ExVivo Staple Line Leak Pressure Comparison against Signia. 7.22.2021. Windchill Document #500700727
5. Park, S. Y., Kim, D. J., Mo Nam, et al.). Clinical and economic benefits associated with the use of powered and tissue-specific endoscopic staplers among the patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Journal of Medical Economics, 2019, 22(12), 1274–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2019.1634081.
6. Miler DI, Roy S, Kassis ES, et al Impact of Powered and Tissue-Specific Endoscopic Stapling Technology on Cinical and Economic Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracic
Surgery Lobectomy Procedures: A Retrospective, Observational Study. Adv Ther. 2018 Apr 16.
CONFIDENTIAL. FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. NOT FOR USE WITH ANY CUSTOMER OR FOR EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION.