References
*Based on loading steps per IFUs prior to tissue manipulation
† ECHELON ENDOPATH™ Staple Line Reinforcement vs. GORE® SEAMGUARD® Staple Line Reinforcement. Hemostasis: evaluated via gross observations of firings requiring intervention in 1.38mm to 2.32mm thick porcine ileum and jejunum tissues, evaluated via a 5-point Likert scale resulting in statistically no difference in Likert scores. Material: based on average total surface area measurements (26.79cm2 vs. 49.21cm2)
1. Ethicon. ECHELON ENDOPATH™ Staple Line Reinforcement Instructions for Use
2. GORE, Seamguard Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement Instruction for Use
3. Ricketts C, Pollack E. Evaluation of setup by nurses of a novel click and go staple line reinforcement system. Global Surgery. 2020.
4. Kesler KA, Zeltsman D, Martin LW, et al. Safety and usability of an endo staple line reinforcement device for pulmonary resections. J Thorac Dis. 2023;15(11):6151-6159.
5. Zheng Q, Ge L, Zhou J, et al. Risk factors for prolonged air leak after pulmonary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2022; 45:2159-2167.
6. Mitsui S, Tanaka Y, Nishikubo M et. al. Safety and efficacy of new staple-line reinforcement in lung resection:a prospective study of 48 patients. Surgery Today. 14 Aug 2023.
7. Ethicon, Dimensional Measurements of Gore(R) Seamguard Compared to Echelon Endopath(TM) Staple Line Reinforcement. 7.29.2019. Windchill Document #SCN066699
8. Ethicon, Evaluation of Hemostasis Following Use of the EB3 Zeppelin Echelon Reinforcement Material Device in Swine? Acute. 7.8.2020. Windchill Document #PSB004768
9. Ethicon, Staple Pull Evaluation for Zeppelin and Competitive Product. 12.02.2019. Windchill #PRC091255
CONFIDENTIAL. FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. NOT FOR USE WITH ANY CUSTOMER OR FOR EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION.